58
to be or be would not have been asked to be
witness. events
he
a wilure. But at all counts be certavuly Now on the 305 April when be received. the fee from prisoners practically n discharged from purther answering the 20th Franch.
ou
The other part of his explanation is a matter for inquiry, but I must confere Vinowing as I do 8W. Suonden's views I have great difficulty in understanding him to speak in teams that could lead any, Government Officer Interpreter leystunately to infer thist
a fee after a trial_
he could receive a
Crinimal or cial - for any work doce
in conection with that trial such
as.
tiandating document's
documents studying
questions
41
questions at the instance of one of the
solicitors to be answered at the trial
as a
which
59
or allending in bowrt Nevertheless Dr. Eild is entitled to lies testimony person in Authority. I think it strange also that thee Governor- could have spoken in termes soluch would lead to this inference especially I happen to Vinow on the best authority, theat & Ectel returned a claque given him for work dan in
As
a Civil case as he said because the komernor could not allows him to
Keep it. However pending the ___ obtaining of this testimony in his favour to which he is entitled I hope His Excellency, the __
Administrator
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.